Roundup Lawsuit for Farmers and Agricultural Workers: Your Complete Guide
Agricultural workers represent the largest and strongest category of Roundup plaintiffs. Farmers, vineyard workers, groundskeepers, and farmhands who applied glyphosate-based herbicides regularly accumulate far higher doses than occasional residential users — and the risk of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma rises with cumulative dose. If you worked in agriculture and developed NHL, here is what you need to know about your legal options.
In This Article
Who in Agriculture Qualifies
Qualifying agricultural workers include farmers who personally mixed or applied Roundup, employees who worked in fields sprayed with glyphosate, nursery workers, golf course groundskeepers, vineyard and orchard workers, and public-works employees who used herbicides on roadsides or parks. The essential requirements are regular exposure over at least two growing seasons and a post-exposure diagnosis of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma or a related blood cancer.
- Farmers and farm owners who applied Roundup
- Farmworkers and seasonal laborers in treated fields
- Landscapers and groundskeepers with regular herbicide use
- Nursery, greenhouse, and orchard workers
- Municipal or state road-maintenance workers
Evidence of Occupational Exposure
Agricultural workers often have better documentation of exposure than homeowners. Useful evidence includes pesticide purchase invoices, spray logs, Pesticide Use Reports (required in California and several other states), employment records from farms that used Roundup, and co-worker testimony. Even without records, an attorney can reconstruct your exposure history using standard industry practices, property records, and your own testimony about application frequency and method.
Agricultural worker diagnosed with Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma?
Find out if you may qualify — free case review.
Check Eligibility arrow_forwardWhy Occupational Claims Are Stronger
Courts and scientific studies consistently recognize that occupational exposure carries a larger cancer risk than residential exposure. Farmers and landscapers absorb glyphosate dermally during mixing and spraying at levels many times higher than homeowners treating a lawn. The Agricultural Health Study — a long-running U.S. government project tracking farm families in Iowa and North Carolina — specifically identified elevated NHL risk in agricultural glyphosate users, providing powerful evidentiary support for occupational claimants.
What to Do Next
If you worked in agriculture, regularly used Roundup or any glyphosate-based herbicide, and were later diagnosed with Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, a free case evaluation with a mass tort attorney is your first step. Most attorneys take Roundup cases on a contingency basis, meaning no fees unless you recover compensation. Be aware that state statutes of limitations — typically two to three years from diagnosis — can permanently bar your claim if missed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I file if the farm I worked on is no longer in business?expand_more
Yes. Your lawsuit is against Bayer AG (which acquired Monsanto), not your former employer. As long as you can establish exposure to Roundup during your employment, the farm's current status is irrelevant to your claim.
Does any glyphosate product qualify, or only Roundup specifically?expand_more
Any glyphosate-based herbicide manufactured or distributed by Monsanto/Bayer can form the basis of a claim. Generic glyphosate products from other manufacturers may also support claims against those manufacturers. Your attorney will identify the correct defendants.
Can I file if my cancer is in remission?expand_more
Yes. Remission does not eliminate your damages. Your diagnosis, treatment costs, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other losses are compensable regardless of your current health status. In fact, waiting until remission ends might push you past the statute of limitations.
SuperLawsuits Editorial Team
Reviewed by licensed attorneys in our network