PFAS April 2, 2026 · 10 min read

PFAS Water Contamination: Which Communities Are Most at Risk?

PFAS contamination of drinking water is one of the largest environmental health crises in American history. More than 2,800 contamination sites have been documented across all 50 states by the Environmental Working Group, with communities near military bases and industrial PFAS manufacturers facing the highest exposures. In April 2024, the EPA finally established the first federal drinking water limits for PFAS, setting the standard for PFOA and PFOS at 4 parts per trillion. This guide explains which communities face the greatest risk, what the new standards mean, and what affected residents can do.

The PFAS Drinking Water Crisis

Water contamination is the primary pathway through which millions of Americans are exposed to toxic PFAS chemicals. The EPA estimates that PFAS have contaminated the drinking water of more than 200 million Americans, making this one of the largest environmental health crises in U.S. history. Unlike many contaminants that can be addressed through standard water treatment, PFAS require specialized and expensive filtration technology to remove.[1]

PFAS enter drinking water supplies through multiple pathways: industrial discharges from manufacturing facilities, the use of AFFF firefighting foam at military bases and civilian airports, landfill leachate from products containing PFAS, and agricultural runoff from fields treated with PFAS-contaminated sewage sludge used as fertilizer. Once in groundwater or surface water, PFAS travel widely and persist for decades.[2]

2,800+

Known PFAS contamination sites across all 50 states (EWG)

700+

Military installations with confirmed PFAS groundwater contamination (DoD)

200M+

Americans estimated to be exposed through drinking water (EPA)

4 ppt

EPA Maximum Contaminant Level for PFOA and PFOS finalized April 2024

For decades, there were no federal standards for PFAS in drinking water. Water utilities had no legal obligation to test for or remove these chemicals, even as scientific evidence of their health risks mounted. The absence of federal standards left communities entirely dependent on state-level action, which varied enormously across the country.[1]

EPA's 2024 Drinking Water Standards

In April 2024, the EPA took the most significant federal action on PFAS to date, finalizing the first-ever National Primary Drinking Water Regulation for PFAS. The regulation established Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) for six PFAS compounds:[1]

  • PFOA: 4 parts per trillion (ppt)
  • PFOS: 4 parts per trillion (ppt)
  • PFNA (perfluorononanoic acid): 10 ppt
  • PFHxS (perfluorohexane sulfonic acid): 10 ppt
  • HFPO-DA (GenX chemicals): 10 ppt
  • Mixtures of PFNA, PFHxS, HFPO-DA, and PFBS: A hazard index of 1.0

Water utilities serving at least 25 people must test for these PFAS and bring water into compliance by 2029. The EPA estimates that compliance will require between $1.5 billion and $3.4 billion in annual expenditures by water systems nationally. However, the public health benefits are enormous: the agency estimates the regulation will prevent 9,600 premature deaths and tens of thousands of serious illnesses annually.[1]

Important Note

Utilities have until 2029 to comply with the new PFAS standards. This means that if your water tested above these levels in 2024 or 2025, your utility is not yet in violation of federal law, though the contamination is still a serious health concern. You should contact your utility and consider alternate water sources.

Several states including Michigan, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Vermont enacted their own PFAS drinking water standards before the EPA acted, in some cases setting limits stricter than the federal MCLs. Residents in these states have had legal protections in place for several years.[3]

Military Bases and AFFF Contamination

The United States military is responsible for some of the most severe PFAS water contamination in the country. For decades, the military used AFFF (aqueous film-forming foam) to train personnel in firefighting and to suppress fires involving jet fuel and other flammable liquids at air stations, aircraft carriers, and fire training facilities. AFFF contains extremely high concentrations of PFOS and PFOA.[2]

The Department of Defense has identified more than 700 military installations where PFAS contamination from AFFF has migrated into local groundwater. These installations include Air Force bases, Naval Air Stations, Army installations, and National Guard facilities across every region of the country. Communities relying on private wells near these bases have been among the hardest hit.[4]

Some of the most severely contaminated sites include: Pease Air Force Base in New Hampshire (where community blood testing found elevated PFAS in hundreds of children); Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune in North Carolina (which also has a separate contamination history with other chemicals); Eglin Air Force Base in Florida; and Peterson Space Force Base in Colorado. The DoD has been required to provide alternative water sources or filtration to affected communities in many cases.[4]

Most Affected Communities

Beyond military bases, PFAS contamination is severe in communities near industrial PFAS manufacturers. The Environmental Working Group (EWG) has compiled the most comprehensive public database of PFAS contamination sites, drawing on EPA, state agency, and utility testing data. Their database maps contamination in all 50 states, with particularly high concentrations in:[3]

  • Michigan: Communities near 3M manufacturing facilities and military bases have some of the highest documented contamination. Wolverine World Wide's use of 3M Scotchgard in shoe manufacturing contaminated groundwater in Kent County.
  • Pennsylvania: Numerous industrial PFAS users have contaminated drinking water systems in southeastern Pennsylvania.
  • New Jersey: PFAS manufacturing and industrial use has left widespread contamination, including near DuPont facilities along the Delaware River.
  • North Carolina: The Chemours (formerly DuPont) Fayetteville Works plant has contaminated the Cape Fear River with GenX chemicals, affecting the drinking water of hundreds of thousands of residents in Wilmington and surrounding communities.
  • Alabama: The Decatur area near 3M manufacturing facilities has significant contamination affecting Tennessee River tributaries.
  • Minnesota: 3M's historical manufacturing in the Twin Cities metro area has contaminated groundwater serving east Metro communities.

Private Well Water and Rural Risk

Approximately 43 million Americans rely on private wells for their drinking water. Private wells are not covered by the Safe Drinking Water Act and are not subject to any federal testing or treatment requirements. This means that private well owners near contamination sources may have no idea they are consuming PFAS-contaminated water.[5]

Several states have enacted programs to test private wells near known PFAS sources, including wells near military installations and PFAS manufacturing facilities. In Michigan, the state has provided free PFAS testing for private well owners within a certain radius of known contamination sites and has funded alternative water sources for those with contaminated wells. However, many states have no equivalent program.[3]

If you rely on a private well and live near a military base, airport, or industrial facility, requesting PFAS testing is an important step. Many commercial laboratories can test for a panel of PFAS compounds. Some state environmental agencies also offer low-cost or free testing for residents in known risk areas.[2]

What Affected Residents Can Do

If you believe your drinking water may be contaminated with PFAS, there are several steps you can take:

  • Request your utility's water quality report (CCR): Public water utilities are required to provide annual Consumer Confidence Reports (CCRs) that disclose contaminant levels. Check whether your utility has tested for PFAS and what levels were found.
  • Test your private well: Contact a state-certified laboratory or your state environmental agency about PFAS testing for private wells.
  • Use a certified water filter: Activated carbon block filters and reverse osmosis systems certified by NSF International for PFAS removal are effective. Point-of-use reverse osmosis systems at the kitchen tap are particularly effective.
  • Consult your healthcare provider: Blood testing for PFAS is available through some commercial labs and can help assess your exposure level. Discuss any health symptoms or conditions with your physician.
  • Contact an attorney: If you have developed a serious illness linked to PFAS exposure and believe you were exposed through contaminated water, consulting with a PFAS attorney can help you understand your legal options.

Has your community been affected by PFAS water contamination?

If you or a loved one developed kidney cancer, testicular cancer, thyroid disease, or another PFAS-linked condition after exposure to contaminated water, you may be entitled to compensation.

Check PFAS Lawsuit Eligibility arrow_forward

Sources & References

  1. [1] EPA — PFAS Drinking Water Regulation (April 2024) — https://www.epa.gov/sdwa/per-and-polyfluoroalkyl-substances-pfas-drinking-water
  2. [2] ATSDR — PFAS and Your Health — https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/pfas/index.html
  3. [3] EWG — Tap Water Database — https://www.ewg.org/tapwater/
  4. [4] DoD — PFAS Military Contamination — https://www.defense.gov/Spotlights/PFAS/
  5. [5] EPA — Private Wells — https://www.epa.gov/privatewells

Frequently Asked Questions

How do I know if my tap water has PFAS? expand_more

Request your public utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report (CCR), which must disclose detected contaminants. If your utility has tested for PFAS, the CCR will show the results. For private wells, you can test through a certified commercial laboratory. The EWG's Tap Water Database (ewg.org/tapwater) also shows PFAS data for many public water systems.

What filter removes PFAS from drinking water? expand_more

NSF-certified activated carbon block filters (NSF/ANSI 53) and reverse osmosis systems (NSF/ANSI 58) are effective at removing PFAS from drinking water. Point-of-use reverse osmosis systems installed at the kitchen tap are particularly effective. Standard pitcher filters and refrigerator filters may not adequately remove PFAS.

Are military veterans more at risk for PFAS exposure? expand_more

Yes. Military personnel who served at air stations, naval facilities, or any base that used AFFF firefighting foam in training exercises were potentially exposed to high concentrations of PFOA and PFOS. Veterans who developed kidney cancer, testicular cancer, or other PFAS-linked conditions after service at contaminated bases may be eligible for both VA benefits and civil lawsuits.

What is the EPA's new PFAS drinking water standard? expand_more

In April 2024, the EPA finalized Maximum Contaminant Levels for six PFAS compounds. The MCL for PFOA is 4 parts per trillion (ppt), and the MCL for PFOS is also 4 ppt. Additional MCLs were set for PFNA (10 ppt), PFHxS (10 ppt), and GenX chemicals (10 ppt). Water utilities must comply by 2029.

Sources & References

edit_note

SuperLawsuits Editorial Team

Reviewed by licensed attorneys in our network